ICANN and .WEB: now is the time to make decisions!

In 2012, when applications for Generic Top Level Domains (gTLDs) were first opened, seven registries applied to administer .WEB, including Nu Dot Co (NDT), Donuts and Afilias. In such a situation, given the multiplicity of candidates, they are invited to reach an agreement. Otherwise, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) organizes an auction. In this case, the history of .WEB is remarkable since, during the negotiation phase, an additional player intervened in the discussions, namely Verisign. Indeed, the latter had entered into an agreement with NDT by which Verisign would acquire the .WEB gTLD in the event that NDT won the auction. NDT won, and Verisign acquired the gTLD. A few other candidates had touted the method.

Consequently, Donuts sued ICANN in the Californian courts. However, the latter declared themselves incompetent (see Ruby Glen, LLC v. Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers, CV 16-5505 PA (ASx)) since the decision emanating from the panel constituted within the framework of the Independent Review Process (IRP) (Section 4.3. Of the ICANN Bylaws) presents all aspects of an arbitral award, i.e. adjudicative (it is binding on the parties) and exclusive (the panel has an exclusive jurisdiction) (Section 4.3. (x) of the ICANN Bylaws: icann.org). However, the entirely arbitral nature of the decision could be undermined by the possibility for the panel to formulate recommendations, which are by nature non-binding and, in a less convincing manner, by the qualification of “declaration”, to the detriment of the term “arbitral award”.

After numerous negotiations and procedures of various kinds, Afilias sued ICANN on November 14, 2018, by filing a request for arbitration with the International Center for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), the only institution appointed by ICANN to administer arbitration proceedings arising from the IRP. In its decision dated May 20, 2021 (icann.org), the panel considered that ICANN had violated its own bylaws, in particular, by refusing to rule on the validity of the agreement between NDT and Verisign in light of the Applicant Guidebook and Auction Rules. Furthermore, the panel members added that it is not for them to take the place of the ICANN board of directors (ICDR Case No. 01-18-0004-2702, Afilias Domains No. 3 Ltd. v. ICANN, May 20 2021: icann.org). In other words, ICANN must decide once and for all. In a press release dated May 25, 2021, ICANN assured that its board of directors would do everything in its power to enforce the award and review the panel’s recommendations as soon as feasible while inviting the parties to find an amicable solution (icann.org, 2021-05-25). Given the situation, this statement may seem ironic.



1. Domain Names Management IP Twins is an accredited domain name registrar. — We help develop an appropriate domain name strategy and manage portfolios centrally and proactively. Thanks to our proprietary software, we identify cybersquatting cases in all TLDs. Our IP/IT lawyers deliver personalized reports. We may also advise or represent our clients in UDRP or other tldDRP proceedings.

2. Online Brand Protection Counterfeiting is everywhere online. — Nowadays, SMEs are also concerned. Our internal "Detective"​ software identifies the online use of your trademark by unauthorized third parties. We monitor on social networks and online market platforms, worldwide and in all languages. We submit reports on a periodic basis determined in agreement with the client and, where appropriate, we provide enforcement services.

OUR PHILOSOPHY — At IP Twins, we value the relationship with our partners. We nurture a human vision of our profession. Since the creation of IP Twins in 2002, our lawyers and developers have been working hand-in-hand to develop technologies, methods, and processes to ensure the reliability and accuracy of our services. That's why we have developed a variety of specific tools and this is also why our account managers are specialized IP/IT lawyers. Our tools, in constant improvement, are acclaimed by our clients, IP lawyers, and international partners. The reports and analysis we send considerably help them in their mission of domain name management and online brand protection both in the judicial and extrajudicial fields.

OUR CLIENTS — Our clients are law firms or industrial property consultants, companies of all sizes, local authorities, and organizations for the defense of geographical indications, in France and abroad.